The first graphs - ONS for England, and Scotland vs rUK

-






The ONS published England-only numbers, which appeared to show a 2nd wave beginning.

And yet, the whole UK "New Cases" numbers published by the Westminster Government showed no rise.

This was in the period 20th to 25th June








I wanted to know if the whole-UK figures were being used to conceal the England figures.

The Westminster Daily Briefing slides were published with a URL, and the URL turned out also to have the datasets in spreadsheet form.

Great!

But the statistiscs only included Pillar 1 data for Scotland, England & NI.  It did, however, include the total of both Pillar1+Pillar2 data for Wales.

This meant that about 45% to 50% of the data was missing.

The Scottish Government were announcing the total of Pillar1+Pillar2 each day in their daily briefing.

As a first cut, I drew the Scotland data, and subtracted it from the UK data, giving a data-series for the rest of the UK (rUK) data, (and I then calculated the 7 day average, and adjusted for population)



It didn't show a 2nd wave for the rUK, but it did show a substantial difference in rates between Scotland and the rUK.  Maybe NI - with its famously low levels of Covid (for a Home Nation, at any rate) - and Wales were dropping quickly enough to counteract a slight 2nd wave in England?

Maybe the ONS was right, and their graph with an uptick at the end really did show a "levelling off", after all.

Then the ONS updated their graph. Still labelled as showing a "levelling off".  But it seemed, to me,  to confirm the likelihood of the early stages of exponential growth.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Ah, but what about Belgium?"

-
Image
Belgium only produced a set of figures where all care home deaths were presumed to be Covid-related To compare like-for-like, this equates most closely to the UK Excess deaths figures. So I have added the "Belgium scale" to the comparison of Covid Deaths per million people across European nations  As before, the X-axis is not meaningful - the datapoints are spread out only to prevent the labels from overlapping
Read more

Population densities, Greater London & Greater Glasgow

-
A claim often made is that it is not possible to compare Scotland and England because London has a much denser population London;s populationi s larger, and it's population denisty is higher, but not incomparably. Population Area (sq km) Population Density Year Greater Glasgow 1,209,143 368.5 3,281 2011 Greater London 8,908,000 1,572 5,667 2018 Greater London 8,982,000 1,572 5,714 2019 It's worth noting that the City of Glasgow on its own had 1.089 million inhabitants last century, and there has been a concerted effort to lower Glasgow's population density, decade after decade. It's also interesting to note that the City of London only has 8,910 residents. (I used to be one of them.  It was the shortest commute I ever had).  But over 1 million poeople work there each weekday.
Read more